Arab awakening - ABC Online

Find More Stories Be first to comment

Antoun Issa

With Egypt on the cusp of a democratic revolution, it is clear to the world that the Arabs are finally having their awakening. This decade will mark a significant change to the post-colonial Middle Eastern order that has stagnated the region for much of the past century.

The Arab ‘street’, which has been sidelined in the political life of these countries by decades of autocracy, is about to take charge in determining the interests of their states.

As a generation of tweeters take to the streets of Egypt in a bid to oust their dictator, President Hosni Mubarak, it is fair to deduce that globalisation has at last reached the shores of the Middle East.

‘Arab exceptionalism’ no more

The democratic wave that swept through Eastern Europe, Latin America and parts of Asia post-Cold War failed to dint the authoritarian landscape in the Arab world. Rather, Arab regimes tightened their autocratic rule when the world was heading in an opposite direction.

Discourse on globalisation and development, thus, largely bypassed the Arab world. It became widely anticipated that the Assads, Mubaraks and Abdullahs of the region would continue their dynastic rule by gifting their rule to their progeny.

‘Arab exceptionalism’ was a phrase coined to normalise the region’s autocracy and lack of development, and justify the failure of globalised trends to penetrate the Middle East. Adherence to this perception of the Arab world blinded many to the realities on the ground, and consequently caused shock in the West and Israel when millions began pouring onto the streets of Cairo to demand Mubarak’s resignation.

Indeed, a week prior to the beginning of the Egyptian protests, Israel’s head of military intelligence Major General Aviv Kochavi was certain on the stability of the Mubarak regime.

Global communications

Albeit dormant, the Arab ‘street’ was not totally immune to the effects of globalisation. Despite living in heavily censored states, young Arabs connected to the World Wide Web and discovered a means to challenge the status quo. Social media – a global phenomenon of Facebook, Twitter and blogging – pierced the tightly held information censorship bubbles of the Arab world, and enabled locals to air their frustrations in an open space.

Popular Facebook pages were up a week earlier informing Egyptians of mass protests, a date was chosen, a Twitter hashtag was selected, and before you knew it, tens of thousands were in the streets.

This is not to detract from the core elements of the protests. Indeed, like most revolutions, Egyptian grievances are found in poverty, unemployment, and a lack of freedoms. Social media and the internet, however, have provided Egyptians and Arabs with a means in which to communicate such grievances, exchange ideas, and aid in collective action.

Internet is for Arabs what cafés were for the French in 1789, an open space where aggrieved citizens can share their frustrations and work together towards an alternative. Social media did not cause the protests in Egypt and Tunisia, but it facilitated them.

Globalised ideals 

The use of the internet and social media is not the only indication of the effects of globalisation on the Middle East. Protests in Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen and Jordan are all chanting the same demand: democratic reform.

A globalised ideal that has made its way to all corners of the world is now on the lips of Arab protestors. Liberal democracy – a concept championed by the US seemingly everywhere but the Middle East – has been touted as the preferred alternative to authoritarianism.

In an era where the West feared an Islamist takeover of the region, that protestors are chanting for democracy should be a sign of comfort. Islamism infers that Arabs are still exempt from the global system, and are opting to pursue an antagonistic form of governance. However, the calls for democracy in Cairo and Tunis demonstrate an eagerness from the Arab ‘street’ to join the global system, and begin to receive the economic benefits promised by liberal democracy.

Indeed, liberal democratic reforms also include a redefinition of a nation’s interests. Sovereignty in the Arab world has long been confined to the selfish interests of despotic ruling families. This proved much easier for the US to manage in terms of finding allies to support its regional interests, such as containing Iran and protecting Israel.

Democracy, conversely, bestows sovereignty onto the people, and thus – as we understand from our own democratic traditions – the national interest becomes a complex and fluid concept driven by altering attitudes within the public.

At present, the Arab public remains hostile to Israel, and ambivalent towards Iran, and this poses a short-term dilemma for Washington. Long-term gains, however, outweigh any short-term costs, with a democratic and developing Arab world moving with the globalisation process and not against it. The social and economic pressures brought by despotic, corrupt rule will alleviate, and radical religious extremists will have a smaller pool of frustrated, impoverished youth to recruit from.

Using globalised means of communication to promote a globalised political system, Arabs have proven that they are no longer an exception.

Antoun Issa is an Australian-based freelance political writer, blogger, Global Voices Online author, and commentator on international affairs, with a specific interest in Middle Eastern issues.

View the original article here

What Israel fears in Egypt - Washington Post

One might expect that Israelis, who live in the only democracy in the Middle East, would turn out in the squares of Jerusalem and the gardens of Tel Aviv to show solidarity with the demonstrators in Egypt. The protesters, after all, are seeking to overthrow an authoritarian regime.

Israelis, however, have stayed at home, warily following events on TV and the Internet.

It is not a democratic Egypt that Israelis fear but the prospect of Egypt being hijacked by enemies of democracy, of Israel and of the United States. Within every revolution are some who hope to use democratic processes to establish oppressive regimes. This was, to a large extent, what triumphed in Iran in 1979 and what happened in Gaza only five years ago. Many Israelis wonder why it would be any different in Egypt, which is home to the world's most powerful and popular Islamist movement.

Should the government of Hosni Mubarak be replaced by one not truly committed to freedom and peace, the consequences for Israel could be devastating. As Egypt struggles toward an internal balance that appeases all forces, including the Muslim Brotherhood, peace with Israel could be the price of an Egyptian compromise. And the risks are worse if the Brotherhood, an organization deeply hostile to Israel, America and the West, gets to call the shots.

Consider what an Egyptian official once told me: "There is no war without Egypt." From 1948 to 1973, Israel had to fight four wars against coalitions of Arab armies. Since the peace agreement between Egypt and Israel, however, there has not been even one war between Israel and Arab states. The lives of many Israelis and Arabs have been saved over the past four decades, and the security burden on Israel's economy has become more bearable. Yet if the peace with Egypt dissolves, the risks to the Jewish state and its citizens cannot be overstated.

The implications for the region could be massive. If Israel's western neighbor turns hostile, where would that leave our eastern neighbor, Jordan? Would it remain at peace with us? What would be the impact on other pro-American regimes? How many weeks, or days, would the new alignment of interests between Israel and most Arab regimes last against an aggressive and nuclear-armed Iran? If there is a negative outcome to the events unfolding in Egypt, the world will be living with a new Middle East, but it will be very different from the one we all aspire to.

Meanwhile, Israelis are uncertain about some positions of the U.S. administration. They remember how, after the 2009 presidential election, the Obama administration refused to support courageous Iranians who demonstrated against the oppressive "hate to America" regime in Tehran. People are understandably puzzled when news reports show an ally of America - even an authoritarian one - abandoned while U.S. rivals are honored with state dinners in Washington, despite their gross violations of human rights. In this highly charged region, Washington's actions are carefully watched. Israelis are looking at the results of U.S. policy in Iraq, the recent loss of Lebanon to Iran and how American pressure on Israel led to a "democratic" takeover of the Palestinian Authority by Hamas terrorists. Israelis live every day with the results of the U.S. administration's blunder that made already-difficult negotiations with the Palestinians impossible.

Israelis have learned the hard way that Israel cannot shape internal developments in our neighboring Arab states. While they wish America could responsibly engage in this process and ensure a positive outcome, they also doubt whether even America can prevent events from proceeding toward, and down, a slippery slope.

It is said, and is possibly true, that worry may be in the Jewish genes. With our history, having paved so many roads with good intentions only to see them lead to destruction, and having experienced how democratic slogans and processes have been abused again and again by murderous dictators, it is hard not to be concerned.

The future of Egypt is uncertain: Is it a hostile Islamist tyranny, using democracy as a fake ladder, or a compromise at Israel's expense that may be about to occur? The fear of war and death is on Israelis' hearts and minds.

But if a real democracy, committed to the values of freedom and peace, were to emerge in Egypt, Israelis would overwhelmingly support it.

The writer was Israel's ambassador to the United States from 2005 to 2009.

View the original article here

DIARY - France to Feb 28 - Reuters

Sorry, I could not read the content fromt this page.

View the original article here

Historic temple caught in Thai-Cambodia crossfire - Washington Post

PREAH VIHEAR, Cambodia -- High on a cliff overlooking the jungles of northern Cambodia, heavily armed troops crouch in fortified bunkers on the grounds of an ancient temple turned modern-day battlefield.

The stone remains of Preah Vihear, built nearly 1,000 years ago, are supposed to be a protected U.N. World Heritage site. Instead they are at the heart of a dangerous tug-of-war between Cambodia and Thailand - one that has taken at least eight lives and forced 15,000 to flee in four days of clashes recently.

The battle over a hilly patch of land in this remote countryside is rooted in a decades-old border dispute that has fueled nationalist passions and been driven by domestic politics and conspiracy theories on both sides.

A fragile truce has held since Monday night, but the dispute remains unsettled, and troops are digging in for another round of combat.

The Cambodians filled fresh sandbags earlier this week, stacking them meticulously in 10 bunkers along one of the temple's low outer walls. It looks out over a ravine toward Thailand's sandbagged foxholes on the other side.

"We're just praying in our hearts for this to be over," said Hun Demong, a Buddhist monk who fled into a Cambodian army bunker after the fighting broke out on Feb. 4. "We only hope it will not start again."

With ornamental panels dedicated to the Hindu deity Shiva, Preah Vihear was a stunning achievement of the Angkorean empire, whose realm once took in parts of modern-day Thailand and Vietnam.

When the latest firing stopped, the great stone temple itself stood as a silent victim, small chunks of its darkened gray walls blown off by shrapnel from shells fired from Thailand.

The tail of an exploded rocket lay at the feet of a squatting Cambodian soldier atop the 160-step stairway at the temple's entrance. Along a stone causeway leading farther into the complex, an empty gun battery looked out over a charred hillside, its shredded trees and gnarled saplings bearing testament to the ferocity of the fighting.

A pool of dried blood spattered the floor under a sandstone archway, the spot one mortally wounded soldier was carried to by comrades after being hit by an artillery blast.

There is no simple answer to what sparked the latest fighting.

The temple has been the subject of an intense boundary dispute since French colonial forces withdrew from Cambodia in the 1950s.

View the original article here

India, Pakistan Agree to Resume Peace Talks - Salt Lake Tribune

India, Pakistan Agree to Resume Peace Talks The Washington Post

First published 1 hour ago
Updated 38 minutes ago Updated Feb 10, 2011 07:19PM New Delhi • India and Pakistan agreed Thursday to resume formal peace talks that were broken off after the 2008 terrorist attacks in Mumbai, which were blamed on Pakistan-based militants. The decision could ease tensions between the nuclear-armed rivals and was welcomed by the Obama administration.

The United States has urged the Indian government to resume the dialogue with Pakistan, in part because their rivalry undermines efforts to stabilize Afghanistan. There has been a string of meetings in the past year between officials from both sides, but Thursday’s announcement of a dialogue “on all issues” marks a significant step forward, regional experts said.

It also represents something of a concession by India, which had been pressing Pakistan to bring to justice those responsible for the November 2008 attack on Mumbai, India’s financial hub, when gunmen stormed luxury hotels and a Jewish center, killing 166 people.

Retired Indian Maj. Gen. Ashok Mehta, who has convened informal talks involving retired military and foreign service officials, as well as opinion leaders, from both countries, said India had realized how hard it was for Pakistan to comply with that demand, given the reluctance of judges there to prosecute suspected militants and the reluctance of witnesses to come forward.

“The conditions India imposed in the aftermath of Mumbai were dictated by domestic political compulsions,” Mehta said. “Now that more than two years have passed, we ourselves have realized the conditions have to be watered down, and that is precisely what we have done.”

Copyright 2011 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. blog comments powered by Disqus

View the original article here

Korean Talks End Without Agreement - Wall Street Journal

SEOUL—Midlevel military officials from South and North Korea ended two days of talks Wednesday without agreeing to higher-level discussions, closing for now a slim opening they had created to discuss a flare-up of tensions over the past year.

The outcome wasn't surprising. Statements from the two countries over the past month showed they held vastly different goals for the meeting, and they took several weeks just to negotiate its particulars.

Kim Tae-Hyung/European Pressphoto Agency South Korean Col. Moon Sang-Kyun, left, and North Korean Col. Ri Seon-Kwon walking briskly to their meeting Wednesday

But the prospect of no further talks leaves the U.S., China and other countries in a quandary over how to proceed with North Korea.

The U.S. watched the proceedings for signs that North Korea was willing to discuss difficult issues, which could make it worthwhile for Washington to re-engage with Pyongyang diplomatically. Asked later about the development, State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley said, "We'll just continue to evaluate what unfolds going forward, but clearly, this was an important opportunity for North Korea to demonstrate its sincerity."

China, North Korea's closest ally, is believed by many outsiders to have pressured it into talking. Beijing is thought to have become angry over Pyongyang's belligerence, most notably after its attack on a South Korean island in November.

Military talks between the rival Korea's stall, dealing a setback to efforts to restart international aid-for-disarmament talks. Video courtesy of Reuters.

North Korea's access to China's economic support may hinge on its ability to demonstrate it isn't going to engage in more tension-raising behavior, said Dan Pinkston, Korea analyst at International Crisis Group in Seoul. "The key question is will this be perceived by the Chinese as a legitimate and sincere effort by the North to reconcile with the South?" Mr. Pinkston said.

The talks, held between colonels of the two sides who had met before, most recently in September, were designed to set conditions and talking points for a meeting of higher-level officials later this month or next. But after the colonels met on Tuesday, a difference was clear. South Korea said it was seeking a ministerial-level meeting while North Korea only wanted deputy ministers to meet.

Yonhap/European Pressphoto Agency The two colonels started Wednesday's talk with a shake but ended without an agreement.

Also, South Korea wanted North Korea to acknowledge—and move toward some form of apology for—its attacks on the South last year, including the Nov. 23 artillery barrage of Yeonpyeong Island, which killed four people, and the March 26 sinking of a patrol ship, which killed 46. Both incidents happened in the area of a maritime boundary that North Korea disputes.

North Korea's representatives at the talks on Tuesday said that South Korea's insistence on talking about those matters amounted to a rejection of the importance of discussions. On Wednesday, North Korea again criticized the South for focusing on the attacks, the South said. North Korea's representative also repeated the country's oft-stated line on the attacks: that it wasn't involved in the sinking and that the island bombardment was the South's fault.

In a statement after the meeting broke up, South Korea's defense ministry said, "We kept our position that we are willing to hold a high-level military talk if North Korea accepts our agenda and level of official."

North Korea on Thursday Asia time issued a lengthy statement blaming South Korea for the collapse of the talks and said it didn't feel any need to meet again. "South Korea pretends to be interested in talk with us, but in their minds they are not," the statement said.

In early January North Korea began a campaign to promote inter-Korean talks, which it officially proposed later in the month. But from the start, its purpose for such discussions was at odds with South Korea's. North Korea's state media repeatedly stated that the talks should "promote the national reconciliation and unity and hasten independent reunification," a phrase that to Pyongyang means control of the South by the North.

That notion is considered ridiculous in the South. But because North Korean officials rarely want face-to-face discussions, South Korea grabs most opportunities, even when little is expected to be achieved. Last week, South Korean President Lee Myung-bak described this week's meeting as merely a test of North Korea's "seriousness for dialogue."

— Jaeyeon Woo contributed to this article.

Write to Evan Ramstad at evan.ramstad@wsj.com

View the original article here

Cambodian-Thai border rift sees no immediate settlement - Xinhua

PHNOM PENH/BANGKOK, Feb. 10 (Xinhua) -- As of Friday, two days have passed without gunshots disturbing the 11th-century Preah Vihear temple after the Feb. 4-7 bloody clashes between Cambodian and Thai troops, but there's a fear that real peace is still far out of reach in the disputed border area.

The skirmishes, in which heavy weapons including rockets, machine guns, mortars and artillery were resorted to, have reportedly killed at least eight Cambodian and three Thai soldiers, wounding many more, and compelling tens of thousands of villagers to flee home for shelters.

Witnesses said damage was done to the 900-year-old temple, a World Heritage site, and that although firing had stopped for two days, additional Thai tanks were seen en route to the contested areas, and Cambodia's military deployment near the frontier was not lessened.

The border between Thailand and Cambodia has never been completely demarcated. Although the International Court of Justice ruled in 1962 that the temple itself belonged to Cambodia, the row over the 4.6-square-km territory around the temple has never been resolved.

As the international community urges both sides to display restraint and calls for a peaceful solution to their age-old territorial dispute, the two neighbors are even at odds over the way of working the matter out.

Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen favors the United Nations Security Council's decision to hold a meeting on Feb. 14 to discuss the Cambodian-Thai border dispute.

View the original article here

Teen suicide bomber kills 20 at Pakistan army centre - Reuters

By Zeeshan Haider

ISLAMABAD | Thu Feb 10, 2011 2:27am EST

ISLAMABAD (Reuters) - A boy in a school uniform blew himself up at a Pakistani army recruitment center on Thursday, killing 20 cadets, officials said, in an attack that challenges government assertions that crackdowns have weakened militants.

Pakistan's army has carried out a series of offensives against al Qaeda-linked Taliban insurgents. But the operations in lawless tribal areas along the Afghan border have failed to break the resolve of Taliban fighters determined to destabilize the U.S.-backed government.

The brazen bombing on Thursday in the northwestern town of Mardan suggested militants are regrouping after a lull in major attacks.

Militant operations in recent months have been mostly sectarian and have not focused on military targets.

"The bomber struck recruits when cadets were busy in their morning training," a military official told Reuters. At least 20 people were wounded.

The boy apparently walked into the compound, officials said.

"It seems the Taliban are still a very potent force because they continue to attack installations, even if they have been quiet for a time," said former general Talat Masood.

"They reassert themselves after a while, and it will be a while before we consider them to be less of a threat."

The Taliban have previously launched bold attacks on the military, Pakistan's most powerful institution.

Last March, two suicide bombers targeting the Pakistani military killed at least 45 people in the city of Lahore, including nine soldiers.

In 2009, Pakistani Taliban militants disguised as soldiers attacked the army's headquarters in Rawalpindi and later took 42 people hostage in a nearby office building.

Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani condemned Thursday's attack at the Punjab Regiment Center.

"Such cowardly attacks cannot affect the morale of the security agencies and the resolve of the nation to eradicate terrorism," he said in a statement.

Gilani's government faces pressure on several fronts.

It is trying to revive a stagnant economy propped up by an $11 billion Internet Monetary Fund loan which requires politically sensitive reforms.

View the original article here

Google Executive in Egypt is Released - Wall Street Journal

(See Corrections and Amplifications item below.)

Google Inc. executive Wael Ghonim has been released from government custody in Egypt after disappearing during the massive protests that have rocked Egypt for two weeks, ending a tense wait over the whereabouts of one of the rallying symbols for the anti government movement.

Google, Inc. Wael Ghonim

The silence around Mr. Ghonim, who vanished 10 days ago, broke late Monday evening, when a one-line message was sent from his Twitter account, @ghonim: "Freedom is a bless that deserves fighting for it."

The message set off a wave of cheering on Twitter. Google later confirmed his release with a tweet of its own — "Huge relief—Wael Ghonim has been released" — and a friend of Mr. Ghonim's said the executive was safe and unharmed at home with his family.

Mr. Ghonim, Google's marketing manager for the region, had been involved with Internet-based activists mobilizing opposition to the regime, and after his disappearance became a rallying symbol for the young demonstrators in Cairo's Tahrir Square.

Many suspected he had fallen into the hands of Egypt's feared security services, but there had been no confirmation. Then Sunday evening, his brother Hazem said people who met yesterday with Egypt's new vice president, Omar Suleiman, had brokered his release.

Monday brought a tense waiting game. Mr. Ghonim's family was expecting him to be released around 4 p.m. Cairo time. The U.S. State Department said it had received confirmation of the release, but four hours later, Mr. Ghonim's relatives said they had yet to be contacted regarding his whereabouts.

Members of Mr. Ghonim's family spent the early evening in Tahrir Square, the area in downtown Cairo that has become the symbolic heart of the protest movement and the spot where Mr. Ghonim was thought to have been arrested. Multiple news outlets had erroneously reported that the executive was being taken there shortly after 4 p.m., the time at which the prime minister had announced he would be released.

Many details of Mr. Ghonim's disappearance are still unknown. Friends and political activists who know Mr. Ghonim suspect that the executive was seized on Jan. 28 in the downtown square after he joined thousands of others protesting for the ouster of President Mubarak.

The Egyptian Organization for Human Rights estimates that at least 1,275 people have been detained by police since the protests began. Most have been released, lawyers at the center and other human-rights groups say. Those who remain in jail are considered key targets of the Egyptian security services, according to human rights lawyers.

A group of elder Egyptian statesmen who have opened negotiations with Mr. Sulieman to press for constitutional and political reforms told the government that Mr. Ghonim's release was critical to prove to the protesters that the government's promises to enact reform were sincere.

"There's a huge gap of mistrust among the youth in Tahrir towards the government. We told the vice president that Wael and all people who have been detained for expressing their political opinions must be freed," said Naguib Sawiris, an Egyptian billionaire who has taken a lead role within the negotiations.

It remains unclear what role, if any, Mr. Ghonim played in organizing the Jan. 25 protest movement itself, the largest Egypt has seen in more than 30 years. However, he played a prominent role in online activism in the months ahead of the protests which have forced the resignation of Egypt's government and historic political concessions from the autocratic president.

Corrections & Amplifications

Wael Ghonim is head of marketing for the Middle East and North Africa for Google Inc. In addition, the company doesn't have a head office for the Middle East region. An earlier version of this story incorrectly said he was Google's top executive in the region and incorrectly described Google's Dubai office as the company's regional headquarters.

Write to Nour Malas at nour.malas@dowjones.com, Margaret Coker at margaret.coker@wsj.com and Keith Johnson at keith.johnson@wsj.com

View the original article here

Follow the Egyptian money - Washington Post (blog)

"So in addition to supporting institutions and free and fair elections, we are committed to supporting strong civil societies, the activists, organizations, congregations, intellectuals, reporters who work through peaceful means to fight corruption and keep governments honest. Their work enriches the soil in which democracy grows."
--Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Feb. 5, 2011

The Egyptian protests have thrown a spotlight on what the Obama administration has done in its first two years to help promote democracy in Egypt. The administration has claimed that it privately pressed Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak for changes, but we have documented how President Obama, at least in his public statements, tended to play down the need for specific actions by the Egyptian government.

Clinton's statement, made while discussing the turmoil in the Middle East during a security conference in Munich, raises another question: How committed has the administration been to supporting democracy-minded civic and social organizations -- what are known collectively as civil society-- in Egypt? To find out the answer, we need to follow the money.

The Facts

Since the Camp David peace accords more than three decades ago, the United States and Egypt have had an unspoken bargain in terms of the roughly $2 billion in aid given each year to Cairo: The Egyptian government had veto power over which nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) could receive the money. This deal meant that funds labeled by Washington as promoting democracy often ended up being used for other projects, such as sludge removal or to bolster the very judicial institutions used to jail democracy advocates.

Meanwhile, the largest chunk of the annual largess, about $1.3 billion, was given to Egypt's military and security forces. The security forces have been repeatedly cited in the State Department's human rights report for torture, prolonged detentions without charge and other abuses. While overall aid to Egypt has declined in recent years, the budget for the security forces and the military has remained mostly intact.

The George W. Bush administration tried to change the dynamic regarding civil society funding, though its effort met with fierce resistance by the Egyptian government. There were banner headlines in the Egyptian press the first time a U.S. ambassador actually gave money to institutions that were independent of Hosni Mubarak's regime, even though the funds amounted to just $1 million. One Egyptian newspaper called it a "bombshell announcement."

The Bush administration's effort was also backed by Congress, which tried to condition aid on improvements in Egypt's human rights record and directed that "assistance shall not be subject to the prior approval by the government of any foreign country."

Egyptian entities that took money directly from the United States ran the risk of being labeled American stooges by Egypt's state-run media. A 2009 audit of Egyptian aid by the USAID inspector general found that the results of the U.S. government's democracy effort were mixed, though the "greatest success" was achieved in programs funded directly by the United States.

"A major contributing factor to the limited achievements for some of these programs resulted from a lack of support from the Government of Egypt," the report said. "According to a mission official, the Government of Egypt has resisted USAID/Egypt's democracy and governance program and has suspended the activities of many U.S. NGOs because Egyptian officials thought these organizations were too aggressive."

Toward the end of Bush's term, his fiscal year 2009 budget proposed spending $45 million on democracy and good-governance programs in Egypt, including more than $20 million on promoting civil society. This would have kept the amount earmarked for democracy programs the same as 2008, even as spending in other areas, such as health, education and economics, was scheduled to be reduced in what is known as the Economic Support Fund as part of a reordering of priorities.

"The United States has developed strategic partnerships with reformers from Egyptian civil society and within governmental institutions," the administration said in a document to Congress. "While some democracy and governance activities, such as reforming the judiciary, will be implemented through direct assistance to the GOE [Government of Egypt], assistance to civil society and other non-governmental organizations (NGOs) will be funded directly."

But that nascent effort was largely shelved when the Obama administration took office. For fiscal year 2009, the administration immediately halved the money for democracy promotion in Egypt; the civil society funds were slashed 70 percent, to $7 million.

Meanwhile, money that was to be given directly to civil society groups was eliminated and the administration agreed to once again fund only those institutions that had Mubarak's seal of approval. Jennifer L. Windsor, an associate dean at Georgetown University's School of Foreign Service and former executive director of Freedom Watch, said she was told at the time by U.S. Ambassador Margaret Scobey that the shift was made to "facilitate" better relations with Egypt's government.

The new policy received little public notice at the time but is documented in official government documents and also on the USAID Web site. Obama's 2010 budget justification to Congress eliminated all mention of giving direct assistance to civil society groups. The 2011 budget proposed modestly increasing democracy funding -- from $20 million to $25 million, with $8.5 million going to civil society groups -- and explicitly stated that "grants will be made to Egyptian registered NGOs."

Freedom House, a bipartisan democracy advocate, tried to sound a warning in 2009 about the reductions. After the administration halved democracy funding for Egypt, Freedom House said in its analysis of the foreign aid budget, "The Obama Administration should reassess this reduction in support and strengthen its diplomatic efforts on behalf of independent democracy and human rights activists in this important country."

In 2010, Freedom House again raised an alarm, and added: "We have serious concerns about the US Government decision to stop funding civil society groups not registered with the Egyptian Ministry of Social Solidarity, essentially giving the Egyptian Government veto power over who receives funding from USAID. Not only is this decision harmful to civil society groups in Egypt, it sets a dangerous precedent in terms of U.S. foreign assistance." It also noted that although the administration indicated it might offset the cuts in bilateral aid with increased funding from other entities--the State Department suggests this totaled $6 million in 2010--"it is not clear that has been the case."

The Obama administration signaled it would cut democracy funding for Egypt within weeks of taking power, even before the president went to Cairo and made his famous speech on outreach to the Muslim world.

Just days before his address, a group of Middle East experts debated the issue on a Harvard University blog. Windsor wrote that the decisions "were a terrible mistake."

She added that she had just returned from Cairo and "what I found most heartening was the diversity of groups and individuals who seek genuine change." They were disorganized, fragmented and needed more support, she said, but "their potential is demonstrated by the fact that the Egyptian security services have asked for a massive increase in funding" -- roughly equivalent to the cut in U.S. funding to democracy groups. "So the advocates for oppression in Egypt will get more funds, and the advocates for freedom get less," she concluded.

State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley acknowledged Wednesday that "funding for democracy activities in Egypt did drop" between fiscal year 2008 and 2009, which he attributed to the Bush administration's proposed cut in overall economic support funds. "We increased funding in fiscal year 2010 and sustained that in our proposal for fiscal year 2011 while also reorienting our approach to provide direct support to indigenous Egyptian organizations."

Crowley added: "We are currently looking at ways to expand our support to civil society in Egypt given the events that are now unfolding. Unfortunately, Congress is contemplating severe cuts in foreign assistance which potentially threaten these efforts at a time when they can have the greatest impact."

The Pinocchio Test

Clinton is certainly correct to say that the United States supports and encourages civil society groups around the world. But when it comes to Egypt, the administration's performance appears to fall short.

Obama ended a potentially promising effort to support democracy groups not beholden to Egypt's authoritarian government in order to curry favor with that government. The administration also reduced the budget devoted to promoting civil society. It is not possible to know whether the tens of thousands of people protesting every day would be better organized or have more visible leaders today if substantial direct funding had been maintained. But it would be better for the administration to admit it made a mistake than to pretend it had not changed the policy.

Two Pinocchios

(About our rating scale).

Follow The Fact Checker on Twitter @GlennKesslerWP

View the original article here

Egyptian foreign minister rejects US intervention - The Guardian

Protesters in Tahrir Square. The US has warned that Cairo has not done enough to meet the protesters' demands. Photograph: Pedro Ugarte/AFP/Getty Images

The Egyptian leadership is pushing back against American pressure for rapid political reform, again warning that mass demonstrations and spreading strikes to demand President Hosni Mubarak's immediate resignation could lead to a military coup.

Egypt's foreign minister, Ahmed Aboul Gheit, rejected Washington's demand for concrete actions to show that major change is under way, saying that Washington should not "impose" its will.

The White House responded by warning that Cairo has not done enough to satisfy what the Obama administration has previously characterised as the legitimate demands of the protesters.

"I think it is clear that what the government has thus far put forward has yet to meet a minimum threshold for the people of Egypt," said Robert Gibbs, the White House spokesman.

Earlier this week, the US vice-president, Joe Biden, called Mubarak's deputy, Omar Suleiman, the former intelligence chief who is now overseeing dealings with the opposition and the promised political transition, to urge him to immediately lift the oppressive 30-year state of emergency.

In an interview with PBS television in the US, Aboul Gheit was asked if he regarded Biden's call as helpful advice from a friend.

"No, not at all. Why is it so? Because when you speak about prompt, immediate, now – as if you are imposing on a great country like Egypt, a great friend that has always maintained the best of relationship with the United States, you are imposing your will on him," he said.

The Times has reported that Saudi Arabia has threatened to prop up Mubarak if the White House tries to swiftly force him from power. It said that King Abdullah told Obama two weeks ago not to humiliate Mubarak and said Saudi Arabia would step in to replace the $1.5bn (£0.9bn) in annual US aid to Egypt, most of it to the military, if Washington cuts off assistance.

Such an offer would embolden Suleiman who would otherwise be concerned about the impact on the army about the sudden loss of financing.

King Abdullah has defended Mubarak and accused "intruders" of meddling in Egypt's affairs.

Aboul Gheit said that the US should accept the extended timetable for political change outlined by the Egyptian leadership which centres on Mubarak resigning at elections in September.

"So for Americans to come and say 'Change is now', but already we are changing! Or 'You start now', we started last week. So better understand the Egyptian sensitivities and better encourage the Egyptians to move forward and to do what is required. That is my advice to you," he said.

However, talks with Mubarak's political opponents have faltered before they even gained traction after the regime declined to consider the establishment of an interim government.

Diaa Rashwan, a member of a key opposition group, the Council of Wise Men, told the Guardian that talks are going nowhere for now and that pro-democracy campaigners are alarmed at Suleiman's warning - since reiterated by Aboul Gheit - that if the protests continue there could be a military coup.

"The regime is taking a hard line and so negotiations have essentially come to an end. Suleiman's comments about there being a danger of a coup were shocking to all of us. It was a betrayal of the spirit of negotiations, and is unacceptable," he said. "The regime's strategy has been just to play for time and stall with negotiations. They don't really want to talk to anyone. At the start of this week they were convinced that the protests were going to fade away."

Instead, the government was faced with its largest demonstration to date in Cairo on Tuesday with another mass turnout planned tomorrow (Friday), Some trade unions have thrown their weight behind the opposition cause with a series of strikes.

Rashwan said that the lack of swift progress in the talks and the upsurge in protest has shifted the initiative back to the street.

The Egyptian foreign minister said that Mubarak has not considered stepping down immediately as the demonstrators are demanding because it would lead to chaos and possibly a coup.

"When you have a president who is stepping down, you have one of two possibilities. The demonstrators and the opposition insisting that they compose a government unconstitutional. And then maybe the armed forces would feel compelled to intervene in a more drastic manner," he said. "Do we want the armed forces to assume the responsibility of stabilizing the nation through imposing martial law, and army in the streets? The army is in defence of the borders of the country and the national security of the state. But for the army to rule, to step in, to put its friends on the scene, that would be a very dangerous possibility."

View the original article here

Mubarak spurns opposition demands to leave office immediately - Washington Post

'Revolution': As protesters vow more marches, violent confrontation is feared

The military's role: Allegiance of armed forces remains a pivotal issue

Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak ceded some authority to his vice president Thursday but refused to quit, insisting that he would stay in office to oversee a drawn-out transfer of power. His defiance stunned and angered hundreds of thousands of protesters in the capital, who responded with chants of "revolution, revolution."

Enormous crowds, which had gathered in anticipation that Mubarak would announce his resignation in a televised address, expressed disappointment and fury as the message sunk in that the president had no intention of leaving. Some masses moved tentatively toward the heavily guarded state television tower, while others vowed to march on the presidential palace.

"Oh Mubarak, be patient! The people will dig your grave," shouted protesters in the central Tahrir Square late into the night.

Mubarak's rejection of the rebellion, in a rambling late-night speech, capped a confusing day of contradictory messages, exultant expectations and, ultimately, flattened hopes. It left Egyptians and the rest of the world anxious and afraid of how the conflict would unfold in the hours and days ahead.

The Egyptian army, which rolled more tanks into the city center, did not move immediately to impede the demonstrators. But with large protests planned for Friday, the military's allegiance remained a question mark and appeared to swing back and forth between the president and the people.

Some leaders warned that Mubarak was risking a bloody revolt.

"There is no way the Egyptian people right now are ready to accept either the president or the vice president," Mohamed ElBaradei, a Nobel Peace Prize winner and opposition leader, told CNN. "They have lost all authority, all legitimacy. . . . My fear is that the situation will turn violent."

The developments not only shocked Egyptians but seemed to catch the world by surprise, including the highest levels of the U.S. government. In a written statement, President Obama said "it is not yet clear'' whether the transition to democracy pledged by Mubarak would be "immediate, meaningful or sufficient.''

Earlier Thursday, CIA Director Leon Panetta told Congress that "there is a strong likelihood that Mubarak may step down this evening." In an afternoon speech to university students in Michigan, Obama gave no indication that he expected otherwise, calling the events in Egypt "a moment of transformation that's taking place because the people of Egypt are calling for change."

View the original article here

Egypt minister criticises US role - BBC News

10 February 2011 Last updated at 07:51 GMT Mr Aboul Gheit has been Egypt's foreign minister for seven years Egypt's foreign minister has rebuffed calls from Washington to speed up the pace of political reform.

Rejecting a US demand to lift a state of emergency, Ahmed Aboul Gheit said Washington should not "impose" its will on "a great country".

Many thousands of Egyptians have been protesting sine 25 January calling for President Hosni Mubarak to step down.

Wednesday saw protests in Cairo spread to Egypt's parliament, with violence and reports of strikes in other cities.

In reply to Mr Aboul Gheit, the White House said Egypt's transition plans were not yet enough to satisfy those calling for change.

"I think it is clear that what the government has thus far put forward has yet to meet a minimum threshold for the people of Egypt," spokesman Robert Gibbs said.

'Angry, infuriated'

In his PBS interview, Mr Aboul Gheit said Egypt was enduring an "upheaval", and was sharply critical of US statements on Egypt, including Vice-President Joe Biden.

Explicit calls from Mr Biden for "prompt, immediate" action from Egypt were tantamount to "imposing your will" on a long-time ally of the US, Mr Aboul Gheit said.

Continue reading the main story

Washington does not now think the Egyptian government is serious about delivering change, and wants everyone to hear that message”

End Quote Mark Mardell BBC North America editor On the issue of Egypt's emergency law, in place for four decades, Mr Aboul Gheit described himself as "amazed" by Mr Biden's reported comments for it to be lifted.

Jailbreaks amid the recent street protests meant that 17,000 prisoners are now loose on Egypt's streets, the foreign minister said.

"How can you ask me to disband the... emergency law while I'm in difficulty? Give me time. Allow me to have control, to stabilise the nation, to stabilise the state, and then we would... look into the issue."

After an initial reluctance to become publicly involved in Egypt's internal disputes, the White House has in recent days repeatedly called for an "orderly transition" in Egypt.

But Mr Aboul Gheit was critical of Washington's posture during the early days of protest.

"The first four, five days, it was a confusing message. And I was often angry, infuriated.

"But, through discussions with the administration, I think now we have an administration that understands exactly the difficulties of the situation and the dangers and the risks that are entailed in a rush towards chaos without end. So... the administration's message now is much better."

The tens of thousands of protesters taking to the streets of Cairo and other cities over the past 16 days have called overwhelmingly for Hosni Mubarak, the country's long-serving president, to step down immediately.

Mr Mubarak has said he intends to step down after presidential elections, due to be held in September.

Newly appointed Vice-President Omar Suleiman has begun a process of talks with opposition political figures. But opposition groups fear the government is stalling for time and will fail to enact meaningful changes.

New focus

Despite Mr Aboul Gheit's words, Washington once again reiterated its call for rapid and meaningful change in Egypt.

State department spokesman PJ Crowley said the US had been calling for years to an end to the state of emergency, while Mr Gibbs insisted it was obvious that Mr Mubarak's pledges of reform had not gone far enough, fast enough.

"And I think, unless or until that process takes hold, I think you're going to see the continued pictures that all of us are watching out of Cairo and of other cities throughout Egypt.

"If there's some notion on the government side that you can put the genie back in this bottle, I think that's gone a long time ago," he added.

The BBC's North America editor Mark Mardell says Western diplomats believe the US administration has changed its approach in the last two days. Washington does not now think the Egyptian government is serious about delivering change, and wants everyone to hear that message, our correspondent says.

After more than two weeks of protests focussed on Tahrir Square in central Cairo, Wednesday saw protests in the capital spread to the country's parliament, the People's Assembly.

Many regard the assembly as illegitimate after its members were elected in elections widely seen as heavily rigged in favour of Mr Mubarak's party.

There were also reports of widespread industrial action, and of protests outside Cairo - in cities such as Suez and Port Said - turning violent.

Researchers from Human Rights Watch (HRW) say they have confirmed the deaths of 297 people since 28 January, based on a count from eight hospitals in the cities of Cairo, Alexandria and Suez.

No comprehensive death toll has been given by the Egyptian government.

Send your pictures and videos to yourpics@bbc.co.uk or text them to 61124 (UK) or +44 7725 100 100 (International). If you have a large file you can upload here.

Read the terms and conditions

View the original article here

Iran Presses Opposition to Refrain From Rally - New York Times

Security forces stationed outside the home of the reformist cleric Mehdi Karroubi, one of the country’s most prominent opposition leaders, prevented Mr. Karroubi’s son from seeing his father on Thursday, according to the son, Hossein.

In an interview with an Arabic-language news Web site, Al Arabiya, Hossein Karroubi, who is politically active, said that the security forces told him that other family members, except his mother, were also barred from seeing his father.

The elder Mr. Karroubi and another government critic, Mir Hussein Moussavi, had submitted a formal request to the government to hold the rally on Feb. 14. Opposition Web sites have also reported the arrest of a number of people associated with the two opposition leaders. On Wednesday night, Taghi Rahmani, an activist close to Mr. Karroubi, and Mohammad-Hossein Sharifzadegan, a former welfare minister and an adviser to Mr. Moussavi, were arrested at their homes by Iran’s security forces. The Web sites also reported Thursday that two reformist journalists had been arrested.

On Wednesday, Iran’s top prosecutor, Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Ejehi, said that the request to hold a demonstration separate from the annual government-sponsored rally to mark the anniversary of the Islamic Revolution, scheduled for Friday, was “political” and “divisive.”

“Setting a different date means that these individuals are separating themselves from the people and creating divisions,” Mr. Mohseni-Ejehi said in comments reported in the semiofficial news agency ILNA, referring to the opposition leaders who called for the rally. Iran has expressed official support for the antigovernment movements in Egypt and Tunisia, but supporters of Iran’s opposition criticize that stance as hypocritical, given the government’s brutal suppression of Iranian protesters who took to the streets after the disputed re-election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2009.

“If they are not going to allow their own people to protest, it goes against everything they are saying, and all they are doing to welcome the protests in Egypt,” Mr. Karroubi said in an interview with The New York Times earlier this week via an online video link.

The last opposition protests against the elections were held more than a year ago and were halted after the government crackdown killed scores and left many government critics imprisoned.

Neil MacFarquhar contributed reporting from the United Nations.

View the original article here

Over 400 Property Owners Get Paid for Electricity - ABC News

NASHVILLE, Tenn. February 8, 2011 (AP)

More than 400 property owners who use solar power to generate electricity at their homes or businesses are getting paid for it with the help of the Tennessee Valley Authority and local power distributors.

Some residents have large enough arrays of solar electric generation panels that they get rolling credits on their electricity bill or year-end checks. Most are in Tennessee and The Tennessean reports another 200 projects are in the pipeline.

The Generation Partners program allows property owners to feed electricity into the grid and some distributors, like the Nashville Electric Service, pay more than double what the utility charges for power. The program has grown increasingly popular. NES now has 63 customers generating power and 15 others about to begin.

In Ashland City, Carly and Ed Wansing have a $100 credit on their most recent home electricity bill. They installed their panels in 2007 and are leaving the credit to make up for other months when they might use more electricity.

"We build up our credit in the spring and the fall and use the credit in the summer and the winter," said Carly Wansing, an architect with Street Dixon Rick, which also has solar panels.

Their 2.16-kilowatt solar panel system cost them $11,500 after incentives and should take 12 more years to pay off. Along with a $2,000 federal tax credit, the Wansings got a $500 sign-up payment from TVA's Generation Partners program.

Andy Sudbrock got checks from his electric utility in Williamson County last month that totaled $2,010 for electricity generation from panels on the barn at his plant nursery company, Nashville Natives.

"That doesn't factor in all the electricity we didn't have to pay for, either," he said. "We had zero electricity bills all year."

He virtually paid for the $60,000 8.28-kilowatt solar power system in the first year, thanks to some incentives.

About 95 percent of the cost came from a state cost-share program for businesses, a U.S. Department of Agriculture grant, a federal tax credit and a $1,000 signing bonus from TVA and the distributor.

View the original article here

India, Pakistan to hold talks on all issues - The Hindu

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts: Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |

Front Page   

India, Pakistan to hold talks on all issues

Sandeep Dikshit The agreement was reached between Nirupama Rao and Salman Bashir in Thimphu

Secretary-level talks will be held on eight subjects

Issues include counter-terrorism, Kashmir and Siachen

NEW DELHI: Short of calling it composite dialogue, India and Pakistan have agreed to hold wide-ranging talks on all issues they were discussing before the November 2008 Mumbai attacks, according to a simultaneous announcement in both countries.

The agreement was reached during a 90-minute meeting on Sunday between Foreign Secretary Nirupama Rao and her Pakistani counterpart Salman Bashir in Thimphu on the sidelines of a South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) meeting. The details were revealed on Thursday after both sides had briefed their governments.

Secretary-level talks will be held on eight subjects which will be followed by a wrap up round between the Foreign Secretaries. These will be followed by a meeting here between External Affairs Minister S.M. Krishna and his Pakistani counterpart Makhdoom Shah Mehmood Qureshi by July.

The subjects on which talks will be held are counter-terrorism (progress in Mumbai trial included), humanitarian issues, peace and security, including confidence building measures, Jammu and Kashmir, promotion of friendly exchanges, Siachen, economic issues and the Wullar Barrage/Tulbul Navigation Project. The issue of Sir Creek will be discussed at the level of Additional Secretaries or Surveyors-General.

Composite dialogue covering these issues was resumed in 2004 after a summit meeting, incidentally, on the sidelines of a SAARC summit in Islamabad. After completion of four rounds and considerable narrowing of differences as well as progress on many issues, it was put on hold by India following the Mumbai attacks.

With the law of diminishing returns having set in on India's insistence of comprehensive action against Pakistan-based perpetrators of the Mumbai attacks and India's moral high ground having been eroded by the complicity of its nationals in the Samjhauta Express blasts that killed 42 Pakistanis, the Indian side has been consistently indicating a “new approach” in which “all issues will be discussed.”

Afghanistan

Interestingly, speaking to the media in Thimphu, Ms. Rao had hinted at the talks incorporating a new subject — Afghanistan. “Why not? One of the ideas that came up was that why should we be just stuck with discussing these issues, why cannot we discuss more issues? Why cannot we discuss the situation in our region,” Ms. Rao said when asked whether both sides were prepared to discuss coordination of positions on Afghanistan.

Indian officials refused to get stuck in terminology and maintained that while this was no composite dialogue, bilateral ties were such that all issues had to be discussed. “And when you say all outstanding issues are going to be discussed, you will obviously have to discuss every outstanding issue. Therefore, who discusses the outstanding issues? There are a number of stakeholders. A number of government departments would be concerned. So, it has to be a comprehensive exercise, put it that way,” reasoned Ms. Rao.

The decision to resume dialogue on all subjects following the Rao-Bashir meeting is being termed the second Thimphu thaw. The first took place in April last year when Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and his Pakistani counterpart Syed Yusuf Raza Gilani directed their Foreign Ministers and Foreign Secretaries to hold talks aimed at reducing the trust deficit between the two countries.

While Mr. Krishna and Mr. Qureshi did meet in Islamabad in July, their concurrence on some issues was lost in a post-interaction acrimony. The two sides then kept minimal contacts until the Foreign Offices began consulting each other regularly over the past few weeks in the run-up to the Thimphu meeting between Ms. Rao and Mr. Bashir.

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

Front Page

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts: Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary | Updates: Breaking News |

View the original article here

Crash investigation is under way - BBC News

11 February 2011 Last updated at 06:24 GMT The aircraft had two crew and 10 passengers on board Investigations are under way into the crash that killed six people at Cork Airport on Thursday morning.

The wreckage of the Manx2 plane remains at Cork on Friday morning as air accident investigators try to find out precisely what went wrong.

Two flight recorders have already been removed from the scene.

The plane, which was travelling from Belfast, came down in thick fog and burst into flames. Six people died and six were injured.

Air accident investigator with the Irish Department of Transport, Paddy Judge, said they hoped to reconstruct the events surrounding the plane crash by accessing information from the aircraft's black box.

The flight was scheduled to depart Belfast at 0750 GMT and eventually left at 0812 GMT. It was due to land in Cork at 0910 GMT.

The plane first attempted to land from a southerly direction on Cork's main runway, known as Runway 17. This was aborted due to low visibility.

It then tried to land on the opposite, northerly, approach to the main runway - known as Runway 35. The Aviation Authority says it is believed wind was not a problem, but the pilot was still unhappy with visibility.

The plane went into a holding position for 20 minutes, before making a third attempt to land on the southerly approach to the main runway.

At 0940 GMT, the plane was 10 miles out from the airport. At 0950 GMT, the plane hit the ground at what is called the 'western threshold' of the runway. Eye witnesses reported hearing a loud bang.

It is understood the plane flipped over on landing and caught fire.

The names of three people killed in the accident were released on Friday

Brendan McAleese, a cousin of Irish president, Mary McAleese's husband, was killed in the crash.

Pat Cullinan, originally from Omagh, County Tyrone, and a partner in accountancy firm KPMG in Belfast. A third victim, Captain Michael Evans, was a deputy harbour commissioner in Belfast.

Captain Michael Evans was the deputy harbour commissioner in Belfast

Irish, British and Spanish passport-holders were on board the aircraft which was flying between the two cities as part of a scheduled daily service. All their families have been informed.

The identity of the three other passengers killed is likely to be released by Irish police on Friday.

The six injured are being treated at Cork University Hospital.

Dr Gerry McCarthy, head of emergency medicine at Cork University Hospital, said two people are in intensive care with chest, abdomenal and spinal injuries.

Two people remain in a serious condition, while the other two are described as doing "well".

View the original article here

Twins' father 'surfed gun sites' - BBC News

10 February 2011 Last updated at 22:50 GMT Police released an undated image of Matthias Schepp The father of two missing Swiss twin girls trawled websites on suicide, guns and poison before killing himself, police say.

Police also said that Matthias Schepp, who was last seen with the twins on a ferry to the island of Corsica, made the trip back to mainland France alone.

The uncle of six-year-old Alessia and Livia said the latest news was "very, very worrying".

Schepp threw himself under a train in southern Italy on 3 February.

Police spokesman Jean-Christophe Sauterel said analysis of Schepp's work computer had turned up the websites, which also included ferry schedules.

"These factors show that the father had carefully planned his journey," Mr Sauterel said.

"The investigation is now focusing on trying to establish more precisely the movements of the father from Tuesday noon, when he arrived in Corsica with the girls, until Thursday noon, when he was in the region of Naples."

'Terrible premeditation'

Meanwhile, police official Alfredo Fabbrocini told Associated Press that Schepp was on his own when he sailed back to the port city of Toulon in mainland France from Corsica on 1 February.

Prosecutors earlier this week said that the girls were last seen with their father on a ferry to Corsica - the first confirmation that they had boarded the boat.

Continue reading the main story Friday 28 January: Schepp picks up his daughters to spend the weekend with them in their home village, St Sulpice, where both he and his estranged wife have homesSunday 30 January at 1300 (1200 GMT): The girls are last seen with Schepp in St SulpiceSunday 30 January at 1804 (1704 GMT): Schepp crosses the border into FranceMonday 31 January: Schepp sends a despairing postcard to his wife from Marseille; he and the girls take an evening ferry to Propriano, Corsica Tuesday 1 February: Schepp disembarks in Propriano, with or without the girls; he later leaves Corsica for Naples in ItalyThursday 3 February: Schepp throws himself under a train at Cerignola, in the south Italian region of Puglia The 43-year-old father had been looking after the girls for the weekend, but failed to return them home as planned.

He picked up the girls from his estranged wife's house in the Swiss village of St Sulpice on 28 January, before travelling to France and Italy. He was found dead in Cerignola, in the region of Puglia.

An unconfirmed report from a cafe owner in Cerignola emerged in recent days suggesting that the girls were seen with their father shortly before he threw himself under a train.

But Mr Fabbrochini said police had viewed closed circuit video footage from the cafe "over and over," but had not seen them.

He added that days of searching the Cerignola area with sniffer dogs had failed to turn up any trace of the girls.

The twins' uncle, Valerio Lucidi, said Schepp's "terrible premeditation" was "very, very worrying", according to AFP news agency.

On Wednesday, the girls' mother, Irina Lucidi, went on Italian TV to urge viewers who might know anything about the case to contact police.

"I appeal to whoever has seen them or knows something to contact the police," she said on Rai 3's primetime news bulletin.

Alessia was dressed in blue jeans, a striped T-shirt and a white jacket, while Livia wore a purple ski jacket with white and pink sneakers.

View the original article here

Campbell's To Power Soup With Solar Energy - Energy Matters

THURSDAY 10 FEBRUARY, 2011 | Campbell's To Power Soup With Solar Energy

by Energy Matters

Campbell's Soup in the USA will be a little more environmentally friendly as a result of solar power providing energy for its operations in Napoleon, Ohio.
??
Campbell Soup Company yesterday announced a power purchase agreement with BNB Napoleon Solar LLC for the construction of a 9.8MW PV-based solar farm on 24 acres at Campbell's largest plant.
??
The solar farm is expected to provide around 15 percent of the plant's electricity needs, saving the company up to $4 million over the 20 years of the agreement. The system will produce more than 14.7 million kilowatt hours of electricity during the first year of operation.
?
Carbon emission reductions from the clean electricity production is projected to be approximately 250,000 tonnes in total, or the equivalent of taking 2,000 cars off the road each year.
?
Approximately 24,000 SunPower solar panels will be used at the facility, along with Sunpower's Tracker system; which follows the sun throughout the day and angles the solar modules for optimal energy harvesting.
?
The project will generate around 200 local construction jobs in Ohio.?
?
Campbell Soup Company has committed to cutting the environmental footprint of it's product portfolio in half, as measured by water use and CO2 emissions per tonne of product produced. According to the company's 2010 corporate social responsibility report, Campbells recycled more than 84% of waste generated and invested more than $6 million in environmental sustainability projects. The company states it now produces a tonne of food with 19% less energy than it consumed 10 years ago. Campbell's products extend far beyond soup and includes well known brands such as Arnotts, V8 and Pepperidge Farm.
? Other news for Thursday 10 February, 2011

View all news for Thursday 10 February, 2011 on one page

Return to main renewable energy news section

View the original article here

Pirates board, take control of Italian oil tanker - Reuters

ROME | Tue Feb 8, 2011 4:10am EST

A spokesman so no one was injured in the attack on the Savina Caylyn, which took place some 500 miles off the coast of India and some 800 miles off the coast of Somalia.

He said it was believed that at least five pirates took part in the attack, which took place at about 0625 GMT. The crew was made up of 17 Indians and five Italians. A navy frigate was heading to the scene. (Reporting by Antonella Cinelli)

View the original article here

U.S. shooter in Pakistan held for 14 more days: court - Reuters

U.S. consulate employee Raymond Davis is escorted by police and officials out of court after facing a judge in Lahore, January 28, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Tariq Saeed

By Mubashir Bokhari

LAHORE | Fri Feb 11, 2011 1:36am EST

LAHORE (Reuters) - A Pakistani court sent a U.S. national, accused of killing two Pakistani men during what he said was an attempted robbery, to jail for 14 more days on Friday, further dragging out a diplomatic row between the troubled allies.

Raymond Davis, a U.S. embassy employee who Washington says has diplomatic immunity, shot and killed two Pakistani men on January 27 in Lahore in what he says was an act of self-defense.

Pakistan has questioned his diplomatic status and has detained Davis since the incident, infuriating the United States. Washington says his continued detention is a violation of international treaties.

"He has been sent to Kot Lakhpat jail on a 14-day judicial remand," Abdul Samad, deputy prosecutor general, told reporters outside the court, referring to the city's main prison. Police will continue their investigation, he said.

No one from the U.S. embassy was available for comment.

Samad said Davis' lawyer, Hassam Qadir, argued that Davis has diplomatic immunity and should be released, and that all proceedings should be closed to the public.

Qadir declined to comment. The next hearing is scheduled for February 25.

After the court hearing, Davis was sent to the jail amid tight security. Punjab's Law Minister, Rana Sanaullah, told Reuters earlier that the "best possible arrangements" would be made for Davis's security.

"All efforts would be made to facilitate him in a better way," he said.

In addition to the two men shot and killed by Davis, a third man was killed when a vehicle from the U.S. consulate, apparently en route to rescue Davis, struck and killed a passer-by.

The case has driven already high-levels of anti-Americanism to new heights in Pakistan, a country the United States considers a crucial ally in the war against militants and vital to ending the war in Afghanistan successfully.

Supporters of the slain men have held protests and burned U.S. flags, reflecting the widespread and virulent anti-American sentiment.

The widow of one of men Davis shot killed herself Sunday night because she said she wanted "blood for blood" and feared Davis would be released.

If it intervenes to seek Davis's release, Pakistan's civilian government will bear the brunt of popular fury at what Pakistanis see as yet another violation of their sovereignty.

But if it allows the Lahore High Court to move ahead with double murder charges, it will infuriate the United States and could even effect a $7.5-billion, five-year civilian aid package.

Earlier this week, Republican Representatives Howard "Buck" McKeon of California and John Kline of Minnesota said they told Pakistani officials on a recent visit that aid could be affected. McKeon is the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee.

(Writing by Chris Allbritton; Editing by Sanjeev Miglani)

View the original article here

Mideast upheaval to alter peace talks - Xinhua

by Adam Gonn

JERUSALEM Feb. 10 (Xinhua) -- With the world's media focused on the street protests in Egypt that now has entered their 17th day, observers are asking whether the Israeli-Palestinian peace process will be put on the backburner because all eyes are on Egypt.

Following the successful ousting of Tunisian President Zine al- Abidine Ben Ali three weeks ago, a wave of popular protests have been sweeping the Middle East with large-scale demonstrations in Egypt, Jordan and Yemen calling for regime change.

Ever since direct Palestinian-Israeli peace talks started in the early 1990s, they have been grabbing headlines across the world. However, with the process mired in stalemate for the last couple of years, fears are rising that it will slip from the consciousness of world leaders at a time when it needs their involvement perhaps more than ever.

Analysts that spoke to Xinhua said that the protests in Egypt and across the region will definitely in the near future receive more attention, but in the long run could lead to a stronger Palestinian position against Israel, if Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak steps down.

STRONGER PALESTINIAN POSITION

Palestinian analyst Hani Masri said that while the peace process is dead at the moment, once the dust settles in Egypt there will be a new reality. That will affect the talks in a positive way for the Palestinians.

"It will be difficult (for Israel) to continue in the same way as before because the Palestinian stand will be stronger and they will be able to reject Israeli positions," Masri said.

"When Egypt becomes a democracy, this will help the Palestinian issue because it will show us that the Egyptian people can rule themselves," he said, adding that this would be better for the Palestinians than the Mubarak regime.

Asked if what is happening in Egypt could spread to Jordan, the only other Arab state that has a peace treaty with Israel, Masri said that it might be possible but that "Jordan has some national characteristics that are not present in Egypt," which makes the situation in Jordan more complicated. Jordan's King Abdullah II has already made some government changes following events in Egypt.

Looking forward, Masri said that what is needed now is another "serious" peace process, but it will take some time before that happens. He said one of the most important preparations for a new process will be the unification of the Arab and Palestinian positions so that a united front can be presented against Israel.

INTERNAL UPHEAVAL

Prof. Mohammed Dajani, director of the American Studies Institute at Al-Quds University in East Jerusalem told Xinhua that in the long run the protests in Egypt will have a positive impact on the peace process and the Palestinian people.

"Egypt is one of the leading Arab countries so whatever events that take place in Egypt affects the region; it has a very strong ripple effect on the countries around it, particularly on the Arab countries," he said.

Dajani believes that Egypt has played a very big part in the peace process and what's happening in Egypt is connected to the peace process. He pointed out that some of the slogans being heard during demonstrations in Cairo - such as "Revolution until victory " - are old Palestinian slogans from the 1960s.

While most commentators have said that protests in Egypt are solely focused on domestic issues, Dajani disagreed.

"It's not only about food and about jobs," he said. "It's also about dignity, about peace, about what is happening in the area and about not just being followers of other big countries."

Dajani agreed with Masri that Egypt's future part in the peace process will be more "moderate," which may bring "equity and balance of the players" that are the main actors in the process.

The protests in Egypt may not only affect inter-governmental relations. According to Dajani, they may also inspire people in the West Bank and Gaza to protest against both the Israeli and government and Palestinian leadership.

"I do believe that in the near future the frustration with the peace process, as well as the frustration with economy and political situation might also lead to protests here," he said.

He added that issues such as the continued Israeli occupation and land grabbing as well as corruption in Palestine would act as "drops adding and then over-spilling."

GAME CHANGER

Gad Gilbar, professor of Middle East modern history at the University of Haifa, said that what is happening in Egypt will not only have a profound effect on the peace process but on the region as a whole.

However, Gilbar also pointed out that predictions about what will happen in Egypt and how that might affect the region are still very speculative since the situation is changing on a daily basis.

He said that one of the earliest assumptions - that Mubarak would step down - has still not happened and that it may take anything from two months to two years before we know what is happening in Egypt.

If the Muslim Brotherhood, which opposes the Egyptian peace treaty with Israel, will be given power in a future government then "we can forget about the peace process," Gilbar said.

Dr. Maha Azzam, an associate fellow at Middle East and North Africa Program at the British think-tank Chatham House, believes that popular protests in Egypt and other countries across the Middle East will grab some of the attention from the Israel- Palestinian peace process.

"Inevitably what is happening in the region is going to take much attention of the people in the region, and also of the U.S.," Azzam said.

However, in order to have stability in the region there is a need to keep a close eye on what's happening with the Israeli- Palestinian issue, Azzam added.

Azzam agreed that events in Egypt will affect the way the Palestinian people view and judge their own leadership, which will lead to demands for greater accountability and transparency.

View the original article here

Swiss Twins: Dad's Online Search For Poison - Sky News

3:44am UK, Friday February 11, 2011

Pete Norman, Sky News Online

Twins Alessia and Livia Schepp were taken by their father last month

An international search for the blonde 6-year-olds, Alessia and Livia, has been under way since last month when their Swiss mother reported them missing.

And in an ominous sign, Italian authorities now say the father, Matthias Kaspar Schepp, took his daughters to Corsica - but left the French island alone.

Police spokesman Jean-Christophe Sauterel revealed that analysis of the father's work computer had turned up the new leads and the investigation is also now focusing on his behaviour before he disappeared.

"Before leaving Switzerland he researched websites for information on firearms and various methods of suicide, different poisoning techniques and ferry timetables," Mr Sauterel said.

The search for the missing girls continues

"Investigations continue in Switzerland and in Italy, but are now revolving around Corsica."

Schepp, 43, was found dead on February 3 in the Italian city of Cerignola after apparently throwing himself under a train.

His Audi A6 was found parked near the station, with no child car seats or children's clothing inside.

Schepp picked up his daughters on January 30, but did not return them to their mother, Irina Lucidi, that night, or to school the next morning, as planned.

She has since made an emotional appeal for information about her daughters.

The parents, who had separated, lived in St. Sulpice, an affluent lakefront community in Lausanne, and police tracked his movement from Lausanne to France using his mobile phone signal.

He left Lausanne with the girls in the afternoon and the next day withdrew 7,500 euros (£6,300) in cash in Marseille before buying three tickets for the French island of Corsica.

Several witnesses have come forward to say they saw the twins with their father on the boat, notably in the children's play area. One witness has formally recognized the father at the port in Propriano on the morning of February 1.

Before leaving Switzerland he researched websites for information on firearms and various methods of suicide, different poisoning techniques and ferry timetables

Police spokesman Jean-Christophe Sauterel on the missing girls' father

Mr Sauterel said the father looked at sites about firearms on January 27 - the day he wrote a will police later found in his home and three days before he disappeared with the girls.

"Two days before he fled he looked up information about different poisoning techniques and timetables for ferries between Marseille and Corsica," Mr Sauterel said.

"The information shows that the father had planned the trip in detail."

Police are still investigating if Schepp's online research into poisons was self-directed, or aimed at his children.

:: Anyone with information on the twins has been asked to contact the investigating authorities on +41 21 644 82 31.

View the original article here

Jerusalem council set to approve Jewish housing in Arab neighborhood - Ha'aretz

var dclkSection = "printedition";var dclkChannel = "news"; var dclkArticleId = "1.341693";var dclkPage="article"; Jerusalem council set to approve Jewish housing in Arab neighborhood - Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News Subscribe to the print edition HAARETZ Store HAARETZ Toolbar Hebrew Site SEARCHAdvancedSearch Haaretz.comSearch the webBy title:By writer: Ofer Aderet Raphael Ahren Dov Alfon Gideon Alon Shulamit Aloni Nirit Anderman Moshe Arens Shaul Arieli Meirav Arlosoroff Ehud Asheri Eli Ashkenazi The Associated Press Shlomo Avineri Uri Avnery Reli Avrahami Eytan Avriel Yuval Azoulay Emily B. Landau Anat Balint Zvi Bar'el Shlomi Barzel Moti Bassok Nir Becher Yossi Beilin Avi Beker Yehuda Ben Meir Noam Ben Zeev Dan Ben-David Kobi Ben-Simhon Aluf Benn Meron Benvenisti Uzi Benziman Doron Bergerfreund Morten Berthelsen Amos Biderman Haim Bior Uri Blau Zohar Blumenkrantz Bradley Burston Vered Cohen Ora Coren Orna Coussin Mike Dagan Uzi Dann Mohammad Darawshe Adi Dovrat-Meseritz Yehezkel Dror Yuval Dror Ofra Edelman Haaretz Editorial Ehud Ein-Gil Hagai El-Ad Akiva Eldar Yair Ettinger Fadi Eyadat Donna Feinstein Yotam Feldman Michalis Firillas Shay Fogelman Michael Fox Lily Galili Doram Gaunt Ruth Gavison Anat Georgi Dana Gilerman Avirama Golan Riva Gold Shai Golden Yuval Goren Gershom Gorenberg David Green Tzvia Greenfield Guy Grimland David Grossman Nathan Guttman Dea Hadar Charlotte Halle Doron Halutz Michael Handelzalts Amos Harel Israel Harel Yaron Harel Zvi Harel Danna Harman Amira Hass Nir Hasson Tali Heruti-Sover Rami Hipsh Shahar Ilan Ofri Ilani Avi Issacharoff Gili Izikovich Claude Kandiyoti Or Kashti Sayed Kashua Etgar Keret Jerrold Kessel Jack Khoury Steve Klein Uri Klein Yossi Klein Sivan Klingbail Lior Kodner Noya Kohavi Shoshana Kordova Noah Kosharek Sefi Krupsky Ruta Kupfer Liel Kyzer Gadi Lahav Yehuda Lahav David Landau Yitzhak Laor Vered Lee Shiri Lev-Ari Alex Levac Chaim Levinson Vered Levy Barzilai Daniel Levy Gideon Levy Yitzhak Levy Revital Levy-Stein Nathan Lipson Jonathan Lis Tami Litani Neri Livneh Yoel Marcus Yossi Melman Liron Meroz Merav Michaeli Sara Miller Jerry Mittleman Natasha Mozgovaya Mazal Mualem Tal Niv Gonny Noy Amir Oren Ram Oren Michal Palti Reuven Pedatzur Lisa Peretz Sami Peretz Anshel Pfeffer Adar Primor Zvi Rafiah Barak Ravid Dmitry Reider Ran Reznick Zafrir Rinat Reuven Rivlin Daniel Rogov Guy Rolnik Doron Rosenblum Tamar Rotem Danny Rubinstein Ruth Schuster Relly Sa'ar Yuval Saar Gideon Samet Yossi Sarid Ze'ev Schiff Amos Schocken Hillel Schocken Gershom Schocken, Haaretz chief editor, 1939-1990 Ze'ev Segal Tom Segev Nabil Sha'ath Shlomo Shamir Ari Shavit Na'ama Sheffi Smadar Sheffi Yair Sheleg Ruth Sherlock Sharon Shpurer Nehemia Shtrasler Asaf Shtull-Trauring Eli Shvidler Ruth Sinai Roni Singer-Heruti Emmanuel Sivan Shahar Smooha Ephraim Sneh Norman Spiro Simon Spungin Haaretz.com Staff Rotem Starkman Yuval Steinitz Yedidia Stern Yoav Stern Zeev Sternhell Carlo Strenger Yuli Tamir Ahmed Tibi Aliyana Traison Tamara Traubman Uri Tuval Assaf Uni Yossi Verter Orly Vilnai Dana Weiler-Polak Gidi Weitz Yanir Yagna Eldad Yaniv Oded Yaron A.B. Yehoshua Nir Zalik Tomer Zarchin Benny Ziffer Avi Zilberberg Zvi Zrahiya From date:To date: Tue, February 08, 2011 Adar I 4, 5771 News Diplomacy & Defense National International TV Features Opinion Jewish World Jerusalem & Babylon TheMarker Oligarchs of Israel Culture Travel Books Food & Wine Arts & Leisure Weekend Magazine Anglo File Week's End Special Report / The Schlaff Saga Print Edition News Opinion Features Arts & Leisure Business Real Estate Sports Travel Food & Wine Books Letters Blogs Focus U.S.A. Strenger than Fiction A Special Place in Hell MESS Report Haaretz Store Car Rental initAutoScalingNav({menuId: "nav",sideClasses: true,liHovering: true,spacing: 3,constant: 2,minPaddings: 10}); BREAKING NEWS07:49Google employee detained in Egypt claims responsibility for Facebook page that sparked protests (AP)07:17Turkel Committee to meet with IDF chief designate Benny Ganz to determine eligibility (Army Radio) 06:46Egypt government, opposition to hold 2nd day of talks amid continued protests (DPA) 06:17Right-wing activists say won't 'pass in silence' over intent to arrest top rabbi (Army Radio) 05:43Thailand, Cambodia troops stand on high alert following recent border clashes (Reuters) 04:13Military officers from North, South Korea meet in attempt to quell hostilities (AP) 03:23Islamist rebel leader says ordered Russia airport bombing last month (Reuters) 02:34Tunisia enlists military reservists in effort to restore quiet after nationwide protest (Reuters) 01:45WikiLeaks: Israel has long seen Egypt VP Suleiman as worthy Mubarak successor (AP) 00:53Netanyahu to Likud MKs: I will make act responsibly on gas prices (Israel Radio) 23:43Ehud Barak to travel to U.S. for official visit on Wednesday (Haaretz) 23:00U.S. moves to remove Sudan from terrorism blacklist (DPA) 22:38U.S.-based rights group: 297 killed in Egypt revolt (AP) 22:14Netanyahu: Egypt could fall into hands of radical Islamists after uprising (Haaretz) 21:50U.S.: Muslim Brotherhood's anti-American rhetoric goes counter to regional stability (Haaretz) More Breaking News > Home Print Edition News Published 02:28 07.02.11 Latest update 02:28 07.02.11 Jerusalem council set to approve Jewish housing in Arab neighborhood Several Palestinian families in East Jerusalem's Sheikh Jarrah will be evicted to pave way for two new buildings meant to comprise 13 apartments. ByNir Hasson

The Jerusalem Municipal Committee for Planning and Building is expected to approve Monday the construction of two buildings that will include 13 apartments for Jewish residents in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood of East Jerusalem.

Backing the plan are settler organizations who currently occupy three homes in the neighborhood. Following the plan's approval, it will be necessary to evict a number of Palestinian families living on the site in order for construction to commence.

Settlers evict Palestinians from their home in Sheikh Jarrah in East Jerusalem, December 1, 2009.

Photo by: AP

The planning committee is also expected to approve a new access road south of Har Homa, which will enable the expansion of the neighborhood.

According to the plan to be brought today for approval, two buildings will be razed in the western part of the neighborhood where, until now, nearly no Jews live. In its place, two new buildings will be built. One will have 10 apartments and the other, three.

In both cases Chaim Silverstein, a well known figure in right-wing circles in Jerusalem, is proposing the plans to the municipality. The companies behind the project are registered in the United States, and are probably front companies set up by right-wing activists in order to transfer funds for the purchase of real estate in Israel.

Silverstein has power of attorney rights in both companies, Debril and Velpin.

For the past 18 months there has been a struggle between Arabs and Jews over the activities of settlers in Sheikh Jarrah and against efforts to evict Palestinian families from the neighborhood.

The settlers have been able to expand their hold in the neighborhood because prior to 1948 there was a Jewish neighborhood in Sheikh Jarrah. The court recognized the right of Jews who inherited properties to reclaim their properties. Since then, the settlers are working hard to convince the owners of the properties to sell them the rights so that they could evict the Palestinians and populate the area with Jewish families.

A Supreme Court ruling in 2001 included the possibility of applying for Jewish property rights in the western portion of the neighborhood, and right-wing activists announced that they intended to expand their activities in the area over that portion of Sheikh Jarrah.

"Continuing Jewish settlement in Sheikh Jarrah will seriously harm relations with the Palestinians and will break all agreements that Jewish neighborhoods will remain under Israeli sovereignty and Arab neighborhoods will be under Palestinian sovereignty," says Yosef Alalu, a Meretz city councillor.

Print PageSend to a friendCommentsShareText Size +|-Follow us on TwitterBecome a Haaretz.com Facebook friend   Send to a friend close Recipient's e-mail Your e-mail Message Send me a copy Mandatory field alert.

Send to a friend close

Your message has been sent.

  This story is by:
Nir Hasson TalkBacks Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a commentName : Or login and comment using:

Click here to add an anonymous talkback

Name:

or use your name and picture

Subject: Comment: Add your replyName : Or login and comment using:

Click here to add an anonymous talkback

Name:

or use your name and picture

Subject: Comment:

Reply again LatestMost ViewedMost RatedOpen all 36.2651View >Not Arab, Jerusalem neighbourhood Jochai Rubinstein 07.02.11 11:50

no country, Arab or else would accept the behaviour of the Sheikh Jarrah inhabitants.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

35.2373View >Ghetto Ralph 07.02.11 11:28

The far left wants the Jews in the Ghetto and the Arabs in a township.There are no more places forbidden to Jews in Israel.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

34.10721View >How does the Supreme Court justify the illegal annexation of E. Jerusalem? Michael UK 07.02.11 11:15

Hard to take a court seriously that doesn't seem to be aware that it hascontradicted itself on the occupation. It has judged that Israel is inbelligerent occuptation of the West Bank, yet it refuses to declare allIsraeli settlements there illegal as layed down in the Geneva Conventionand it seems to recognise the illegal Israeli annexation of E.Jerusalem, even, though it's also part of the West Bank.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

33.1742View >Bad Journalism Thomas 07.02.11 10:18

If you want to present all sides how about telling us exactly why didthe supreme court made its ruling. As it is now it looks like a biasedarticle that present it as though the Supreme court made a bad decisionexcept we have no idea whats behind all of it.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

32.11017View >Israel is remarkably.... David 07.02.11 10:14

usurping, racist, and outright ruthless. Why our tax payers moneycontinues to go to this welfare state is mind-numbing. We have over 50million people under the poverty line, and 3B is going to hooligansintolerable of their neighbors and international law.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

31.2183View >BUILD!! Dan Miller 07.02.11 09:30

Building is only an excuse for the arabs to avoid peace. BUILD BABY BUILD!!

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

30.7925View >Israel's time will come ... one day Baci302 07.02.11 09:15

Eventually, the old school jews in the U.S. will die off and then NO ONEwill give a rat's ass about Israel.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

29.23104View >BUILDING ISRAEL Momma Legga 07.02.11 09:10

Hooray!! It's about time that Jews were permitted to build and live inIsrael, all of Israel.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

7520View >Mamma Logga BUILDING PALESTINE 07.02.11 11:40

Hooray!! It's about time that Palestinians were permitted to build andlive in Israel, all of Israel.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

28.6511View >Egypt today, Israel tomorrow Maureen Ann 07.02.11 09:00

Change is coming!

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

27.2186View >Property Rights David S 07.02.11 08:55

It is really amazing how many people are against property ownersregaining their land which was stolen from them under the JordanianGovernment. The poor "palestinians" are being rob and shouldbe compensated. Well, no one is calling for the Jews who were expelledfrom Islamic Countries to be compensated for the losses. The EthnicCleansing was started by the Arabs. They don't like when the RIGHTFULOWNERS come back and take possession of what is theirs. When Arabsstart respecting what belongs to others, then others will startrespecting them. The world does not run on Sharia Law!

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

527View >But when the WB Pals complain that we are stealing their land Esther R 07.02.11 11:28

... who heeds that?!... where is equal and reciprocal justice?

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

26.982View >at #3 most of the world DOES NOT KNOW what israel does. They just knowit exists. We need to educate the world what israel does just likeisrael is educating the world about the Holocaust Monsignor du Tres 07.02.11 08:46

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

25.635View >Nobody's noticed what is happening in Egypt? Mike A 07.02.11 08:45

You think that it's "business as usual"? Methinks somebody'sgot to wake up and smell the coffee before all hell breaks loose!

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

24.1357View >why aren't people equally outraged at me 07.02.11 08:28

the arab property owners that sold the buildings?

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

23.614View >Just an observation. li 07.02.11 08:27

Right now is probably the single most important time, in at least 40years, for the state of Israel not to antagonize local populations.Israel's next war will be in the cities and acts like this will eachhave echos.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

22.2086View >Wow, 13 apartments jonny K. 07.02.11 08:10

meanwhile in the Arab country of Sudan probably 13 women were raped, 13children killed, not to mention the 13 more Black muslims on top ofmillions displaced by the Arab Muslims. All you Israel haters need toget lives, and do some reading on some REAL oppression committed byMuslim countries every second of every day that are infinitely worsethan building 13 freakin apartments.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

21.4318View >Settlers bulsy as beavers working for one state solution Ivar 07.02.11 08:06

The two state solution is dead, long live the one state solution! Bravo settlers

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

20.534View >When will they learn?? Erik 07.02.11 07:48

Injustice has a limited shelf-life - vide Tunisia, Egypt, (... Gaza,Syria, Lebanon, Iran, ... Israel?)

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

19.618View >Turn about is fair play Crazy Horse 07.02.11 07:48

Silverstein and his cohorts in these American "front"companies deserve to be arrested by US marshals and sent to Guantanamoto be held with the other terrorists. The assets of those Jewish frontcompanies should be attached and frozen just like those of thePalestinian front companies that were funding groups in Gaza and theWest Bank.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

18.9013View >There Should be Equal Treatment Josh 07.02.11 07:47

For many years Israeli Arabs have sought to reclaim their property thatoften they were evicted from by force during the war for independence.There are many complicated laws dealing with this in Israel. No arab, tomy knowledge, has ever succeeded in their attempts (even when succeedingin the courts the military and goverment have stepped in to preventtheir attempts). Nevermind all the Palestinians who fled the country andhave not been allowed to return...there are many, many examples ofIsraeli Arabs...in other words people who are citizens of Israel whonever left Israel but who are not allowed to go back to their prewarhomes. Why now are Jews (of which I am one) allowed to evict arabs outof homes based on some prewar Jewish ownership (the original ownersaren't even reclaiming the property) in a densely arab neighborhood ofeast jerusalem. This to me is apartheid, simply put, applying the lawquite differently to different racial groups....even to those who dohold citizenship. I can't understand this. This is not democracy.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

6210View >totally agree 07.02.11 11:21

The funny thing is when you tell this to the people in Europe theyusualy dont believe you and say its palestinian propaganda!

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

1776View >No Arab owned Property in Palestine. Jochai Rubinstein 07.02.11 11:27

Every inch of Palestine was baught by Israelis.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

17.2769View >Undoing the ethnic cleansing of Jews IW 07.02.11 07:38

To all the knee-jerk Israel-bashers: these properties were owned by Jewsbefore the area was ethnically cleansed by their Palestinian neighborsand the Jordanians. It is long past time that this wrong was righted andthe properties returned to its rightful owners. And to those who thinkthat somehow Jews have no "right" to live in areas where theyformerly lived, too bad.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

16.7913View >Israel does not want peace. Maki 07.02.11 06:57

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

15.2281View >it's none of your freaking business, what Israel builds in Ierushalaim. Miron 07.02.11 06:54

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

14.1879View >This is great! Rachel 07.02.11 06:49

Jews rebuilding in East Jerusalem is a good thing.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

13.7511View >settlements gary albert 07.02.11 06:43

It is amazing we have not learned anything. These settlerments are aroadblock to peace. Its a shame. we are in 2011. nothing has changed.This goverment should resign. ,I am a proud jew who is a zionist, noton the back of arabs. Its 2011. The times they are a changing.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

12.1118View >That decisions affecting TC, California 07.02.11 06:35

the peace and security of Israel can be left to the Jerusalem PlanningCommittee is obviously a ruse for the government to avoid responsibilityfor decisions that are clearly its own.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

331View >Bibi's been letting this sort of 'hands off' thing happen all along Woof! 07.02.11 09:00

And not just in Jerusalem

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

11.28130View >We all seen what happened in Egypt Daniel 07.02.11 06:22

All these peace agreements could be turned over at the drop of the hatby arab sides. Israelis, do not give any land for any kind of so-calledpeace agreement as you already experienced giving out land to gaza...and turmoil in Egypt where another deadly islamic entity wiggles its wayto the government... Build settlements and populate Israeli Land withJewish People. Arabs have so mcuh land it is not even funny. Jordan canshare some land with palestinians, the can easily afford that...

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

3710View >plenty of room for Jews David Lucier 07.02.11 07:14

As we know, there's plenty of room for Arabs in the Middle East; butthere's a lot of resistance to moving Arabs out of"Palestine." Why not have Jews take over Manhattan, and movein, using the same techniques as the Jewish Fund did in"Israel." Everything's for sale in the US and New York City isa perfect place for immigration, much better than Jerusalem; and thenon-Jewish population can move easily to any other part of the NorthAmerican Continent. ...no problem.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

72View >If you behave like a child, you will be spanked like a child, Kiev500 07.02.11 07:52

Of course it's for your own good.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

4012View >pssst! Hey, Daniel! Mr.Giggles 07.02.11 09:39

Giving away land is not the same thing as relinquishing an illegaloccupation of land. Gaza never belonged to Israel, and neither does E.Jerusalem. Also, I'm thinking you learned the wrong lesson from theEgyptian protests.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

3113View >USA Sami 07.02.11 10:37

Hey Buddy, Arabs are the owner of the land .By the way ,New york canalso afford few more Israelis so you can get you luggage and move there.Anything not built in fairness and Justice will never last and whathappened in Egypt inshallah will change everything in thar Region. livewith Peace and with the hate-------

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

10.11923View >ISRAEL WILL NEVER LEARN! EL 07.02.11 06:21

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

9.19228View >Ethnic Cleansing Adam 07.02.11 06:12

More ethnic cleansing from good old Israel. A light unto nations...mybutt.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

1561View >Buried in the 7th Paragraph... Eve 07.02.11 06:51

The headline screams "Arab Neighborhood." Only in the 7thparagraph is there reference to the fact that that this has long beenJewish-owned land and that Arabs expelled the Jews decades ago andoccupied thier homes. Reclaiming what belongs to you and has been takenaway by force is not "ethnic cleansing" in any honest use ofthe term.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

1055View >Pitiful SDHD 07.02.11 07:02

A few evictions of people living on properties which are to be developedisn't ethnic cleansing. Arabs live in Israel, the West Bank and Gaza...those areas haven't been ethnically cleansed. The only time they wereethnically cleansed were when Egypt and Jordan captured the West Bank,Gaza and East Jerusalem and ethnically cleansed them of Jews. Jewsreclaiming their properties is the furthest thing from ethnic cleansing.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

618View >eve dee 07.02.11 10:49

Can the Arabs get back their properties that were stolen in West Jerusalem!

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

8.16432View >And the orchestra played on Logios 07.02.11 06:03

More and more countries around the world get disgusted with Israel andside with the Palestinians, even supporting the 1967 borders, but Israelkeeps playing the same tune. Truth be told, this is a relatively goodtime for Israel to act in this way. The world is occupied with the riotsin Egypt and instability in the Middle East, so not many countries willcomplain now about new construction in Jerusalem. But the eating up ofland contested by the Palestinians will not be forgotten, and come thisSeptember, the chances are the UN General Assembly will approve aPalestinian state in the '67 borders. After that, it will be almostimpossible to agree on anything less, other than exchange of territory.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

538View >Uh, not really!! Dan Miller 07.02.11 09:30

Check your facts

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

7.40152View >This is a Blessing Abnezra 07.02.11 06:00

Finally the Jews are rebuilding the ancient Jewish street of Shimon Hatzadik.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

229View >Yes,"Finally Jews are rebuilding the ancient Jewish street ofShimon Hatzadik. " Settler 07.02.11 08:25

built with the nice jewich tombs all over.And arabic neighboros hasnothing to do only to take care and tide this nice jewish cemetry insideSheikh Jerrah. "Shimon Hatzadic" is the nice name for newjewish cemetry.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

2213View >Amen! Zionist 07.02.11 08:59

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

353View >... in the land known as "Palestine"!!!! Baci302 07.02.11 09:12

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

437View >Stealing Javed 07.02.11 09:43

Rebuilding the ancient Jewish street of Shimon Hatzadik. on stolen land? Robbed out of pals ? I am sure God will be satisfied with you.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

6.36134View >Supreme Court bill 07.02.11 05:56

The SUPREME cOURT RULED THE PROPERTY BELONGS TO jEWS. Is Haaretz againstthe rule of law?

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

9721View >who sets on the supreme court omri 07.02.11 06:10

Who sets on the supreme court Ahmad and Ali, or David and Yezhak? andyou are talking about justice!!! And who makes the laws???

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

8918View >The Israeli supreme court makes lots of rulings TC, California 07.02.11 06:36

that the government and the settlers ignore all the time. Bill, are youagainst the rule of law?

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

444View >ICJ at the Hague Ruling - 2004 Bill 07.02.11 08:14

The ICJ ruling at the Hague unaminously ruled 13-0 that Israelisettlements are illegal. PERIOD!! Bill, what do you not understandabout that?? Ahh, better to live in your own fantasy land where thetruth is not important.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

473View >And those Jews are also citizens of the occupying power Johnboy 07.02.11 08:35

So wether (or not) they own the property is simply irrelevany: int'l lawstates very, very clearly that an occupying power MUST NOT allow this tohappen. So if these Jews want to "develop" their property thenthey must wait until the occupation has ended before they can move inand start evicting.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

314View >Evicting families is wrong David 07.02.11 09:53

Evicting families so you can move in a group of heavily armed occupationsettlers is wrong. Hopefully the Israeli's will start to see right fromwrong and take a stand. Learn from the Egytian's, you can make a changeand save face.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

301View >How did the court reach its ruling? Thomas 07.02.11 10:13

oh that's right you don't know either!

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

335View >Israel and the Rule of Law Doug 07.02.11 10:48

UNSC 242 outlaws Israel Occupation of lands outside the Green Line The4th Geneva Convention outlaws colonizing conquered territory The UNCharter requires all members to obey all UNSC resolutions.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

5.43150View >Since Jews own that land and Arabs are illegally squatting there James Meeker 07.02.11 05:55

The headline should reflect that. Justice is being done.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

393View >Yet Israeli Arabs who lose land in same year did not get their land back Bloodyscot 07.02.11 08:19

Israel did not control area until 1967 yet ruled on actions from 1948 orbefore, while land under Israel control in 1948 they ruled the other wayon similar actions with Jews gaining land in both.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

443View >Those Jews are also citizens of the occupying power. Johnboy 07.02.11 08:30

Therefore Article 49 of Geneva Convention IV applies i.e. the occupyingpower is unconditionally prohibited from allowing this to happen FOR ASLONG AS THAT OCCUPATION CONTINUES. "Justice is being done"No, it isn't, because FOR AS LONG AS THAT OCCUPATION CONTINUES theoccupying power is presuming a jurisdiction that it simply does nothave.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

384View >same justice should apply for palestiians just facts 07.02.11 09:52

If jews that have inherited in 1948 of before houses in Jerusalem yesthey have the right to reclaim them BUT the same rule should apply topalestinians whose properties were taken by jews in Tel Aviv end Haifaand elsewhere , they also have the right to claim back their properties(it is called the right of return) Good luck !

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

242View >do you have act of property to show us? tia_algeria 07.02.11 10:06

I am waiting......

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

4.12623View >Bringing Egypt to Jerusalem Mark of Lewiston 07.02.11 05:54

It would seem that the Israeli right is determined to bring the Egyptian"virus" to Jerusalem. Virus is John McCain's term. Is Israelon such good terms with its Arab citizen population and with thePalestinian under population so that the democracy movement will have noimpact? Or is the plan to out-Mubarak Mubarak in suppressing the movement?

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

3.18937View >Israel has lost it's morals. David 07.02.11 05:52

Evicting families in the name of occupation, Israel is truly revealingitself to the world.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

12914View >Take take take and hide behind God USA Citizne 07.02.11 06:14

Don't create peace, don't let people live as one side by side and blameit all on God. Sounds reasonable ...To anyone out of their mind!

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

708View >Take take take and hide behind God USA Citizne 07.02.11 06:14

Don't create peace, don't let people live as one side by side and blameit all on God. Sounds reasonable ...To anyone out of their mind!

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

988View >Lame SDHD 07.02.11 06:18

Property owners often get to evict tenants if they are developing their properties.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

434View >SDHD Pity it ISN'T in Israel. eh! talknic 07.02.11 07:48

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

553View >Not if they are citizens of the occupying power, no, SDHD, they don't Johnboy 07.02.11 08:27

Citizens of the occupying power have to WAIT until the occupation isended before they can move in to "develop" their properties.You know, Geneva Convention IV, Article 49 'n' all.....

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

453View >So does that mean that the refugees can reclaim their properties, SDHD? I 07.02.11 08:58

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

625View > Israel has lost it's morals ? snag 07.02.11 10:25

What morals ? You can't lose something you don't have.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

2.16633View >In the name of god Shane Onu 07.02.11 05:46

Picture worth thousands of words. Settlers = shame on Jews, shame onJudaism. Fundamentalists everywhere of every stripe. Shame on you.

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

875View >shame on Arabs JaN 07.02.11 09:29

for attacking Israel,now they suffer,looks fair in my books!!

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

1.17520View >Like clockwork...... Johnboy 07.02.11 05:44

Bibi's "gestures" got Israel through the Quartet meetingwithout being condemned, and now that the meeting is over it's back toBusiness As Usual. How predictable....

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

965View >Business as usual JaN 07.02.11 09:27

Jewish country ,Jewish land so remember winners are grinners and do asthey like. Arabs start a war and lose it the spoils go to the victor!

Reply to this talkbackRate:topbt

News Right-wing group claims Gantz also tainted by improper land grab 1 comments News in Brief 0 comments Court issues ruling, with quotes, from nonexistent hearing 0 comments What exactly does the U.S. want from Egypt?11 comments Haaretz Headlines WikiLeaks: Israel long viewed Egypt VP as preferred Mubarak successor 23 comments Egypt making headway in talks, says Obama20 comments Spanish FM snubs Barak as defense minister's political prestige wanes3 comments Court orders government to accommodate East Jerusalem school children2 comments Most Popular 24 hours

What exactly does the U.S. want from Egypt?

11 comments

Jerusalem council set to approve Jewish housing in Arab neighborhood

74 comments

Police seek arrest of rabbi for support of book justifying killing non-Jews

15 comments

Spanish FM snubs Barak as defense minister's political prestige wanes

3 comments Israel special Back to top

News: Diplomacy and Defense | National | International | Opinion | Sports | Features | Elections

Jewish World: News | Features | Diaspora Culture: Travel | Books | Food and Wine | Arts & Leisure

Print Edition: News | Opinion | Business | Real Estate | Sports Magazine: Friday | Anglo File | Week's End

Haaretz.com Blogs: Focus U.S.A. | MESS Report | A Special Place in Hell | Strenger than Fiction

Haaretz Site Rules | Contact us | Employment Opportunities | Advertise on Haaretz.com | People and Departments

UI by Netcraft | Design by Design Factory | Accelerated by cotendo

Haaretz.com, the online edition of Haaretz Newspaper in Israel, and analysis from Israel and the Middle East. Haaretz.com provides extensive and in-depth coverage of Israel, the Jewish World and the Middle East, including defense, diplomacy, the Arab-Israeli conflict, the peace process, Israeli politics, Jerusalem affairs, international relations, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, the Palestinian Authority, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, the Israeli business world and Jewish life in Israel and the Diaspora.

View the original article here